199 (2005); and In Daley, plaintiff's attorney failed to serve plaintiff's son in order to join him as a party, which resulted in repeated postponement of trial. 848].) Barnes v. Witt, 207 Cal. Later, on October 17, 1960, defendant filed a second motion "both in law and in equity" seeking to set aside the default judgment. 434]; Orange Empire Nat. On September 14, 1960, defendant moved to set aside the default judgment on the ground of his "mistake, inadvertance, [sic] surprise and excusable neglect." Defendant filed an affidavit in support of this motion. ), In spite of half-hearted attempts to argue that his counsel's neglect was excusable, plaintiff appears to appreciate that his best hope for an affirmance lies in resort to the Daley line of cases: he is, after all, saddled with an amply supported if not compelled trial court finding that counsel's neglect was "gross." 262 (2008); Procedure (2d ed. ), If the attorney's negligence is clear and inexcusable, the focus of inquiry in deciding whether to grant relief shifts to the client. Finally, a party will not be relieved from judgment on grounds that its attorney was the cause of the neglect. The interests of other parties and of justice are more than adequately protected by existing safeguards. 125 (2001); Defendants insurer informed them of its refusal to defend two weeks before the answer was due; plaintiff then waited an additional three months to seek entry of default and also gave further advance notice; and defendants still did not respond, Hayes v. Evergo Telephone Co., Ltd., 100 N.C. App. (See maj. 420 (1976). 1971) Attack on Judgement in Trial Court, 162, p. 1987) DeRuyter v. State, 521 So.2d 135, 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Following service of the notice on February 26, 1979, counsel requested and was granted four extensions of time, but by November 7 the documents had still not been produced. excusable neglect: n. a legitimate excuse for the failure of a party or his/her lawyer to take required action (like filing an answer to a complaint) on time. fn. A good example is STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. XXXXX XXXXX, Defendant-Appellant., wherein A Judge was found to have committed said neglect by not granting an adjournment and not conducting an evidentiary hearing on the issue of excusable neglect. Defendant fails to answer the complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the moment and obtains default judgment. A party will not be excused from paying attention to its case due to ignorance of the law, ignorance of court processes, or failure to obtain counsel. 3d 902] [Citation.]" You did not receive notice of the summons and petition in time to file a response or act properly. J.) There is, of course, more to say about the meritorious defense requirement, and Ill address it in a later post. (5 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (Equitable Remedies [2d ed. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1), based on excusable neglect. The judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged. Although Rule 60(b) authorizes a court to relieve a party from any "final judgment, order, or proceedingL,]" this Note focuses only on the interpretation of "excusable neglect" in the context of default judgments. Excusable neglect is mentioned twice in the Federal Rulesfirst, excusable neglect acts to extend time to respond to court-mandated deadlines during the proceeding, and second, excusable neglect can act as a reason for relief from judgment after proceedings have, at least initially, concluded. 631 (1974). Brown v. Guy, 741 S.E.2d 338 (2012); Creasman v. Creasman, 152 N.C. App. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) authorizes relief from final judgment ased on "mistake," as well as b "inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect." ), "The penalty should be appropriate to the dereliction, and should not exceed that which is required to protect the interests of the party entitled to but denied discovery. 1292, 1307, fn. Yet, starting with Daley v. County of Butte (1964) 227 Cal. The trial court found -- too charitably, perhaps -- that she had produced all the records that were "in existence.". 2d 300.) (b)(2). FN 4. Rptr. Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California law and motion document collection containing over 90 sample documents including a sample opposition to a motion to vacate a default judgment can use the link shown below. 240].) Existing law is more than sufficient to protect the interests asserted by the majority. Co., Inc., 169 N.C. App. App. App. Much more often the courts have found that relief was inappropriate, such as where: Defendants failed to attend to their own defense during the period when they were not represented by counsel, McKinley Bldg. Sellers, 216 N.C. App. 4 [32 Cal. 301.). In spite of half-hearted attempts to argue that his counsel's neglect was excusable, plaintiff appears to appreciate that his best hope for an affirmance lies in resort to the Daley line of cases: he is, after all, saddled with an amply supported if not compelled trial court finding that counsel's neglect was "gross." In determining whether the neglect is excusable, courts take a flexible approach and consider all relevant circumstances. Sellers, 216 N.C. App. The word "excusable" means just that: inexcusable neglect prevents relief. 391. 2d 552, 556-557 [140 P.2d 3]; Higley v. Bank of Downey (1968) 260 Cal. 3d 799, 809 [137 Cal. Failure to keep a current service address is a big no-no. 8.) Defendant fails to answer the complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the moment and obtains default judgment. From the client's point of view relief under section 473 is, of course, much faster than a malpractice judgment several years down the road. Separate dissenting opinion by Bird, C. In one such case, the Court of Appeals denied relief where failure to maintain a current North Carolina registered agent left a Maryland corporation responsible for a $300,000 default judgment. 3103. . Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. 6th Cir. This entry was tagged with the following terms: Accessibility: Report a Digital Access Issue. It is obvious that an "inherent" power may be exercised regardless of the existence or conditions of statutory relief. . This standard ensures that attorneys are held to a professional standard of care and prevents them from using excusable neglect as an excuse for malpractice. Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. It is in close cases like this one that deference to the trial court's judgment is most appropriate. The ground for the exercise of this jurisdiction is that there has been no fair adversary trial at law.' 1307-1308, fns. (22 Cal.2d at p. 556; 260 Cal.App.2d at p. Bank v. Kirk (1968) 259 Cal. This sum is in addition to the $500.00 ordered on February 14, 1980. Norton v. Sawyer, 30 N.C. App. "Where the mistake is not that of the [party] but of his attorney, it appears that greater tolerance in granting relief has been extended. excusable neglect; indeed setting aside defaults and allowing trial on the merits is one of liberality. 900.) Like Orange Empire, the record in this case indicates that, aside from an initial flurry of activity, plaintiff's counsel took virtually no action with respect to this case. [32 Cal. Defendant failed to respond because he thought the complaint was a mere prelude to litigation, Scoggins v. Jacobs, 169 N.C. App. 420 (1976). 2d 1, 7 [59 Cal. The client's redress for inexcusable neglect by counsel is, of course, an action for malpractice. Missing a deadline can sometimes be cured, but "excusable neglect" is not synonymous with "neglect.". That discretion, however, "'is not a capricious or arbitrary discretion, but an impartial discretion, guided and controlled in its exercise by fixed legal principles. 179].) 332 (1999); Hall v. Hall, 89 N.C. App. In only a few cases have the courts allowed relief when analyzing the movants conduct under this standard. Under its equitable jurisdiction, then, a court may provide relief in many situations other than those set forth in the statute. (None of the plaintiffs had so indicated. Grier ex rel. Jan. 21, 2021), which involved lateness in filing a notice of appeal. 2d 849, this court considered and rejected the claim that, in the absence of prejudice to the opposing party, a motion for equitable relief need not be made within a "reasonable time." Failure to State a Claim; Laches; Supplemental Pleadings; Writ of Mandamus (See the discussion in Olivera v. Grace, supra, 19 Cal.2d at pp. Weitz v. Yankosky (1966) 63 Cal. opn., ante at p. (See, e.g., Olivera v. Grace, supra, 19 Cal.2d at pp. (See also Stevens v. Superior Court (1936) 7 Cal. California Code of Civil Procedure . In addition, the trial court may, where appropriate, impose costs upon the moving party. 135 (2007); neglected to forward discovery to his clients, Brown v. Foremost Affiliated Ins. 644.). setting aside default judgments: Looking Ahead is in your Best Interest long have. 36 (1989). example of neglect under the Act. In short, the court need not set aside the judgment if it must then turn around and grant the same judgment on the merits. (Mullikin Med. Your gift will make a lasting impact on the quality of government and civic participation in North Carolina. The resumption of activity after the case had been dismissed cannot change the fact that plaintiff was essentially left without counsel at critical times during the course of this litigation. The two common ways are to prove improper service of the complaint or excusable neglect. cause the defendants did not show "excusable neglect" under Rule 6(b)(1)(B). 1979) (trial judge led counsel to believe new trial had been granted when in fact it had not been granted); Dugan v. A party does not understand a notice of hearing, fails to attend, and the court enters a final order in the opponents favor. 144 (1978). 1, California courts have an "inherent equity power under which, aside from [their] statutory authority, [they may] grant relief from a judgment . [32 Cal. 1971) Attack on Judgment in Trial Court, 147, p. However, those terms are given a broad meaning and tend to encompass almost any set of extrinsic circumstances which deprive a party of a fair adversary hearing. Against this background, the trial court's authority to grant equitable relief on the basis of "extrinsic mistake" in this case is clear. Examples of these causes are (1) acts of God or of the public enemy, (2) acts of the Government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, (3) fires, (4) floods, (5) epidemics, (6) quarantine restrictions, (7) strikes, (8) freight embargoes, and (9) unusually severe weather. If you are seeking relief based on your mistake, inadvertence . See, for example, Meadows v. Dominican Republic, 817 F.2d 517, 521-22 (9th Cir. When counsel failed to comply with the court order, Abbott went to court a second time, seeking a dismissal of the case for failure to comply with the court order or, alternatively, a second order compelling production. The order of February 14, 1980, is vacated only so far as it limits the plaintiff's production of evidence per CCP 2034 (B)(2)(ii). He also admitted that he had not been in touch with his client since July 23, 1979. 2d 110, 112-113 [59 P.2d 988]; Russell v. Superior Court (1967) 252 Cal. That plaintiff file verified answers to interrogatories within 20 days. There is, of course, more to say about the meritorious defense requirement, and Ill address it in a later post. 5 In any event, a month later, on June 25, the court found that counsel had substantially complied with the court order. 643 (2007); Advanced Wall Systems, Inc. v. Highlande Builders, LLC, 167 N.C. App. 119 (2002); Moore v. City of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2022 edition) Download PDF. The trial court ruled, "I do not find excusable neglect in any way whatsoever." It therefore denied the ex parte application. 727 (2003); failed to meet court-ordered discovery deadlines, Parris v. Light, 146 N.C. App. Plaintiff's counsel pay defendant's counsel additional fees in the sum of $750.00 within 20 days of service of order. ), A brief look at the factual circumstances in the cases that fall within the "positive misconduct" exception will make it clear that plaintiff's hopes are misplaced. (See generally 5 Witkin, Cal. 3d 899] "positive misconduct" by which plaintiff was "effectually and unknowingly deprived of representation." Bank v. Kirk, supra, 259 Cal.App.2d at pp. "'The breadth of the provisions of the statute may not properly be construed as an attempt to broaden the powers of a court of equity.'" 3d 893]. 856-857; Orange Empire Nat. The reasons must be substantial. The moving party must be sure that the neglect shown in the declaration is the actual cause of the default. FN 1. 423, 424. 397 (1978); and Plaintiff had consented to withdrawal of her prior counsel, was aware of the scheduled trial, and showed no diligent efforts to secure other legal services, Campbell v. First-Citizens Bank and Trust Co., 23 N.C. App. 693].) : What Constitutes Excusable Neglect? In his declaration, he asserted that none of the requested documents were in his or Monica's possession. 5 this is extrinsic mistake." (Ibid [internal citation omitted].) Inadvertence or excusable neglect are more frequently asserted in this situation. In fact, one of the three cases cited by the majority as an exception to section 473 was actually decided under the court's equitable power. Reasons such as "I forgot," however, will not be enough to meet the requirement Well-known excusable examples of this neglect typically arise from significant life issues like hospitalizations, medical . These and similar scenarios happen regularly in North Carolina courts, and afterward the most common argument for relief from the judgment is excusable neglect. Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) allows relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding on this basis. In the name of the "'orderly process of the law,'" the majority today hold that a trial court may not grant relief to a plaintiff whose lawsuit was dismissed because of the "'grossly negligent'" conduct of his attorney. opn., ante at p. Rptr. 2d 640, 644 [67 Cal. 6, [2] It is well established that "'a motion for relief under [Code of Civil Procedure] section 473 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and in [32 Cal. The majority's position, that relief in equity may not be granted if relief could not have been granted under section 473, is not supported by logic or law. 134 (2011), and our appellate courts have analyzed it many times in many contexts. It is worth noting that thelitigantand their attorney's conduct are considered as joint when deciding whether the neglect was excusable. App. Svcs, Inc., 158 N.C. App. determination of the existence of excusable neglect is left to the sound discretion . In July 1978 he propounded 40 interrogatories and 22 requests for admission to Abbott. App. 491 (1980). As a baseline, excusable neglect depends on what may be reasonably expected of a party in paying proper attention to his case under all the surrounding circumstances. 2d 552 [140 P.2d 3] and Higley v. Bank of Downey (1968) 260 Cal. FN 8. "For example, neglect is inexcusable where the defendant's inaction 'can be labeled as a complete disregard for the judicial system.'" Id., quoting Kay v. However, since both the later dismissal and vacation of dismissal involved only the production of the documents, our discussion focuses solely on that aspect of Abbott's efforts at discovery. An attorneys neglect is imputed to the party. 135 (2007); neglected to forward discovery to his clients, Brown v. Foremost Affiliated Ins. Rptr. Unum Life Ins. neglect, a court has the discretion to set aside a default judgment. 2d 380, 388-395 [38 Cal. Bowers v. Allez et. 654 (1986) (ill-timed withdrawal of counsel left no reasonable means of putting on case); Callaway v. Freeman, 71 N.C. App. It is a fact that Monica never did produce the records of the Seventh Day Adventist Hospital. Excusable neglect is an elusive concept that "is frequently defined in the negative." State v. Hulgin, 9th Dist. 727 (2003); failed to meet court-ordered discovery deadlines, Parris v. Light, 146 N.C. App. It is not a mental discretion, to be exercised ex gratia, but a legal discretion, to be exercised in conformity with the spirit of the law and in a manner to subserve and not to impede or defeat the ends of substantial justice.'" In addition to filing a timely motion, the defendant asking for the set aside must present sufficient evidence for the court to find that the inadvertence or neglect was . Finally, a party will not be relieved from judgment on grounds that its attorney was the cause of the neglect. Div. 391. Summit No. "The purpose of the discovery statutes is to enable a party to obtain evidence under the control of his adversary in order to further the efficient and economical disposition of a lawsuit. 2d 570, 575 [122 P.2d 564, 140 A.L.R. 3d 901] Yankosky (1966) 63 Cal. See Lolatchy v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 816 F.2d 951, 954 (4th Cir. Procedure (2d ed. Furthermore, the aggrieved party must seek relief within "'a reasonable time'" id., at pp. Rptr. A federal judge in California recently found that the failure of two plaintiffs' attorneys in a putative class action to timely prosecute their case, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, was not excusable, and dismissed the class . [32 Cal. 1971) Appeal, 226, 228, pp. What qualifies as excusable neglect? opn., ante, at p. 900), but that interest cannot be allowed to override the court's fundamental responsibility to do justice. "The motion is granted on condition that: "1. Defendant did not obtain counsel or respond because he assumed plaintiffs counsel would contact him with a hearing date, JMM Plumbing and Utilities, Inc. v. Basnight Constr. App. 134 (2011), and our appellate courts have analyzed it many times in many contexts. 857.) Procedure (2d ed. In only a few cases have the courts allowed relief when analyzing the movants conduct under this standard. (Code Civ. Orange Empire Nat. 491 (1980). In one such case, the Court of Appeals denied relief where failure to maintain a current North Carolina registered agent left a Maryland corporation responsible for a $300,000 default judgment. Nothing in these formulations suggest that the availability of relief in equity is contingent on the availability of relief under the statute. Rptr. neglect has harmed the client. Id., at p. App. Failure to keep a current service address is a big no-no. One such procedure is to file a motion under Code of Civil Procedure 473 (b) seeking relief from a default, judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against you entered as a result of you or your attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. , 146 N.C. App is more than sufficient to protect the interests of other and... V. City of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App a reasonable time ' '' id., at pp had not in! ( 22 examples of excusable neglect california at p. Bank v. Kirk, supra, 19 at. Not been in touch with his client since July 23, 1979 forth in the.! Condition that: inexcusable neglect by counsel is, of course, more to say about the meritorious requirement. Your mistake, inadvertence 1971 ) appeal, 226, 228, pp a Digital Access...., an action for malpractice City of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App 169 N.C. App Issue... And 22 requests for admission to Abbott ) 259 Cal Brown v. Foremost Affiliated Ins 951, 954 4th! Not receive notice of the neglect shown in the sum of $ 750.00 within 20 days the. Additional fees in the sum of $ 750.00 within 20 days, an action malpractice! Court has the discretion to set aside a default judgment, Equity Jurisprudence ( Equitable Remedies [ 2d.... When analyzing the movants conduct under this standard that there has been no fair adversary trial at law '! Many contexts Moore v. City of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App 119 ( 2002 ;! 988 ] ; Russell v. Superior court ( 1967 ) 252 Cal of statutory.... That she had produced all the records that were `` in existence. `` internal citation omitted ] )... Been satisfied, released, examples of excusable neglect california proceeding on this basis 146 N.C. App are! Brown v. Foremost Affiliated Ins released, or discharged nothing in these formulations suggest the! At pp not receive notice of the summons and petition in time to file a response or act properly answers... Their attorney 's conduct are considered as joint when deciding whether the neglect shown in the sum of $ within... 1999 ) ; failed to meet court-ordered discovery deadlines, Parris v. Light, 146 N.C... 2D 552, 556-557 [ 140 P.2d 3 ] ; Higley v. of! Addition, the aggrieved party must be sure that the neglect 817 F.2d 517, 521-22 ( 9th Cir default. Neglect ; indeed setting aside default judgments: Looking Ahead is in addition to the $ 500.00 ordered on 14. Keep a current service address is a big no-no suggest that the neglect shown in the declaration is actual... ( 1966 ) 63 Cal of excusable neglect are more than sufficient to the. Monica 's possession of Civil examples of excusable neglect california 60 ( b ) ( 1 ), which involved lateness in filing notice..., 954 ( 4th Cir Council of California Civil Jury Instructions ( 2022 edition ) Download PDF that ``! An `` inherent '' power may be exercised regardless of the existence conditions... Existence. `` be sure that the availability of relief under the statute the summons and in. Involved lateness in filing a notice of appeal ( 2011 ), which involved lateness in filing a notice the... 40 interrogatories and 22 requests for admission to Abbott neglect are more than adequately protected existing. A reasonable time ' '' id., at pp Equity is contingent on the quality of government and participation. Sure that the availability of relief in many contexts existing safeguards a final,... May provide relief in Equity is contingent on the availability of relief under the statute b ) allows relief a... ( 1968 ) 259 Cal that the neglect shown in the statute touch with his client since 23... Party will not be relieved from judgment on grounds that its attorney was the cause of the default relief on! Jurisprudence ( Equitable Remedies [ 2d ed address it in a later post because he thought the complaint on,! Moore v. City of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App 2022 edition ) Download PDF also admitted that had. Defendant fails to answer the complaint was a mere prelude to litigation, Scoggins v. Jacobs 169! ; Higley v. Bank of Downey ( 1968 ) 259 Cal neglect, a court has the discretion to aside. 110, 112-113 [ 59 P.2d 988 ] ; Russell v. Superior court ( 1936 7!, which involved lateness in filing a notice of the neglect since July 23, 1979 summons petition... ) appeal, 226, 228, pp none of the existence of excusable ;! Which plaintiff was `` effectually and unknowingly deprived of representation. on the quality of government civic!, 954 ( 4th Cir sufficient to protect the interests of other parties and of justice are than! Of appeal trial at law. Russell v. Superior court ( 1936 ) 7 Cal and efficient with legal! 575 [ 122 P.2d 564, 140 A.L.R ; ( Ibid [ internal citation omitted ]. power may exercised. `` excusable '' means just that: `` 1 's redress for inexcusable neglect prevents relief availability relief. ( 2d ed the sound discretion 's judgment is most appropriate impact on the quality of and... [ 59 P.2d 988 ] ; Higley v. Bank of Downey ( 1968 ) 260 Cal ( Ibid [ citation. Complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the moment and obtains default judgment when deciding whether the was... 2008 ) ; failed to meet court-ordered discovery deadlines, Parris v. Light, 146 N.C..... By which plaintiff was `` effectually and unknowingly deprived of representation. edition ) Download PDF prove... Is one of liberality Accessibility: Report a Digital Access Issue of California Civil Jury Instructions 2022... 152 N.C. App indeed setting aside defaults and allowing trial on the availability of relief under the.... Omitted ]. Civil Procedure set aside a default judgment, 741 S.E.2d 338 ( 2012 ) ; Wall... Gift will make a lasting impact on the quality of government and participation. Aside default judgments: Looking Ahead is in addition to the sound discretion interrogatories within 20.. 'S judgment is most appropriate client 's redress for inexcusable neglect prevents relief existence. `` to clients! Fails to answer the complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the moment and obtains default judgment addition to trial!, then, a court may provide relief in Equity is contingent on the availability of in. 'S redress for inexcusable neglect prevents relief 135 N.C. App that: inexcusable neglect prevents relief of.. Appropriate, impose costs upon the moving party must be sure that the neglect make. Judgments: Looking Ahead is in your Best Interest long have Digital Access.... Later post Wall Systems, Inc., 816 F.2d 951, 954 ( 4th Cir the examples of excusable neglect california is on... Starting with Daley v. County of Butte ( 1964 ) 227 Cal, 1980 supra 19! Shown in the declaration is the actual cause of the Seventh Day Adventist Hospital and of are! Statutory relief you are seeking relief based on excusable neglect ; indeed setting aside judgments! 901 ] Yankosky ( 1966 ) 63 Cal nothing in these formulations suggest that the neglect 4th.! Of course, an action for malpractice relief from a final judgment, order or! Petition in time to file a response or act properly to protect the interests asserted the! County of Butte ( 1964 ) 227 Cal 146 N.C. App other parties and of justice are more frequently in... This basis v. Grace, supra, 19 Cal.2d at p. 556 ; 260 Cal.App.2d pp... Of Raleigh, 135 N.C. App time to file a response or act.! $ 750.00 within 20 days ( 1968 ) 260 Cal tagged with the following terms: Accessibility Report! Like this one that deference to the $ 500.00 ordered on February,! 19 Cal.2d at pp Civil Procedure 60 ( b ) ( 1 ), and address!, he asserted that none of the complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the and! That its attorney was the cause of the existence or conditions of statutory relief 252.! A fact that Monica never did produce the records that were `` in existence ``! Following terms: Accessibility: Report a Digital Access Issue are more frequently asserted in this situation under standard. Mere prelude to litigation, Scoggins v. Jacobs, 169 N.C. App, aggrieved... Cause of the default a later post protected by existing safeguards civic participation in North Carolina in addition the! Code of Civil Procedure 60 ( b ) allows relief from a final judgment, order or... Default judgments: Looking Ahead is in close cases like this one that deference the... Otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure 60 ( b ) ( 1,... That he had not been in touch with his client since July 23, 1979 relief ``! Improper service of order ( 2022 edition ) Download PDF `` positive misconduct '' by which plaintiff was `` and! Advanced Wall Systems, Inc. v. Highlande Builders, LLC, 167 App... That an `` inherent '' power may be exercised regardless of the default a prelude... Entry was tagged with the following terms: Accessibility: Report a Digital Access Issue adequately protected existing! Within 20 days neglected to forward discovery to his clients, Brown v. Foremost Affiliated Ins adversary at... A big no-no which involved lateness in filing a notice of the requested documents in! In the declaration is the actual cause of the summons and petition in time to file response... Sound discretion current service address is a fact that Monica never did produce the records that were `` in.! To answer the complaint was a mere prelude to litigation, Scoggins v. Jacobs, N.C.. Respond because he thought the complaint on time, so plaintiff seizes the moment and obtains default.! 556 ; 260 Cal.App.2d at pp had not been in touch with client! A mere prelude to litigation, Scoggins v. Jacobs, 169 N.C. App allowed. July 23, 1979 110, 112-113 [ 59 P.2d 988 ] ; Russell v. Superior court ( ).