(a) Criteria for Being Unavailable. Rule 803 Evid. [3a] "Undoubtedly, in a proper case, and in a proper manner, testimony as to the 'state of mind' of the declarant, where there is . (2) There is no evidence that the unavailability of the declarant was caused by, aided by, solicited by, or procured on behalf of, the party who is offering the statement. (B) At the time of any criminal proceeding, including, but not limited to, a preliminary hearing or trial, regarding the alleged violation or attempted violation, is either deceased or suffers from the infirmities of aging as manifested by advanced age or organic brain damage, or other physical, mental, or emotional dysfunction, to the extent that the ability of the person to provide adequately for the persons own care or protection is impaired. In making its determination, the court may consider only the circumstances that surround the making of the statement and that render the declarant particularly worthy of belief. Code 1312, 1315, 1316], Family History Reputation [Cal. VI. Was intended to narrate, describe, or explain something that the speaker was perceiving, and. Evidence Code 1380 Elder and dependent adults; statements by victims of abuse [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 20, above. Section 1250 - State of mind (a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when: This form is encrypted and protected by attorney-client confidentiality. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like the hearsay exception for _____ is applicable only if the declarant is unavailable to testify at trial, Certain statements by a person testifying at trial, who is thus subject to cross-examination, are not hearsay under the Federal Rules. Evid. ((a) Subject to subdivision (b), evidence of a statement by a declarant who is unavailable as a witness concerning his own birth, marriage, divorce, a parent and child relationship, relationship by blood or marriage, race, ancestry, or other similar fact of his family history is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant had no means of acquiring personal knowledge of the matter declared. (b) The statement describes the minor child as a victim of sexual abuse. (4) The statement was made under circumstances which indicate its trustworthiness and was not the result of promise, inducement, threat, or coercion. After all, in one way Hearsay is an evidence rule, contained in both the Federal Rules of Evidence and the California Evidence Code ( Sec. Evid. Evidence of a persons general reputation or particular trait in his community. The reason why we have this California rule of evidence in criminal cases is that hearsay statements are simply not reliable enough to be accepted as evidencebecause they are not made under oath, and the speaker cannot be cross-examined in court. Nonverbal conduct that is intended as a substitute for an oral or written statement (for example, nodding, shaking ones head, or shrugging). Then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition: A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it related to Code Civ. The first covers hearsay statements that: The second covers non-medical hearsay statements, if all of the following are true: Certain written records are admissible evidence if all of the following are true: Example: Miguel is a doctor. The declarant's statements described fear that she was presently experiencing in the Hearsay is not admissible in evidence unless it is specifically allowed by an exception in the rules of evidence or another statute. Former testimony that was given in an earlier court or official proceeding, when the witness is now unavailable to testify; Certain statements about family history, community history, or a persons reputation in the community; Certain statements in which the speaker describes or explains a physical injury (or the threat of a physical injury) that was inflicted on him/her; Certain videotaped statements by an elderly or dependent adult in, Is not made by a witness testifying at the trial or hearing, and. A. hearsay because they constitute "verbal acts" that have independent legal significance and are not introduced to prove the truth of the matter asserted. 3. Proc., Section 527.6 (a) (1). (3)The issue is such that the party to the action or proceeding in which the former testimony was given had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which the party against whom the testimony is offered has at the hearing. (Statement means (a) oral or written verbal expression or (b) nonverbal conduct of a person intended by him as a substitute for oral or written verbal expression.). Ann is not a witness at Shanes trial. Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian. A criminal record can affect job, immigration, licensing and even housing opportunities. But it is admissible as a prior inconsistent statementas long as Ian is allowed to take the stand again to explain the inconsistency. Dist., 1993). If the statement is offered during trial, the courts determination shall be made out of the presence of the jury. Very helpful with any questions and concerns and I can't thank them enough for the experience I had. Simply put, the California hearsay ruleset forth in Evidence Code 1200 ECsays that hearsay statements are inadmissible in California court proceedings.22, This applies to both criminal and non-criminal (civil) trials, as well as to hearings held as part of thepretrial process andsentencing hearings.23, Under California law, the legal definition of a hearsay statement is any statement that, A statement can mean any of the following. ((a) In a criminal proceeding charging a serious felony, evidence of a statement made by a declarant is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness, and all of the following are true: (1) There is clear and convincing evidence that the declarants unavailability was knowingly caused by, aided by, or solicited by the party against whom the statement is offered for the purpose of preventing the arrest or prosecution of the party and is the result of the death by homicide or the kidnapping of the declarant. The California Evidence Code sets out a long list of exceptions to the hearsay rule. [Cal. In this section, we offer solutions for clearing up your prior record. Co. v. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 (3d Cir. For purposes of this paragraph, in addition to those situations described in ORS 40.465 (Rule 804. #379 App. Cassie has since died and cannot testify about the content of those records. California rule of evidence in criminal cases. Please complete the form below and we will contact you momentarily. ADMISSIBILITY LIMITED BY CONFRONTATION CLAUSE (CRAWFORD) docx: 8.03 . (3) Whether the statement is corroborated by evidence other than statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section. Code 1281], California Vital Statistics [Cal. Evidence Code 1311 Statement concerning family history of another [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 17, above. Code 1282, 1283], A written finding of presumed death made by an employee of the United States authorized to make such finding pursuant to the Federal Missing Persons Act (56 Stats. Example: Tom is on trial for California DUI. ((a) Subject to subdivision (b), evidence of a statement concerning the birth, marriage, divorce, death, parent and child relationship, race, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar fact of the family history of a person other than the declarant is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and: (1) The declarant was related to the other by blood or marriage; or (2) The declarant was otherwise so intimately associated with the others family as to be likely to have had accurate information concerning the matter declared and made the statement (i) upon information received from the other or from a person related by blood or marriage to the other or (ii) upon repute in the others family. Evid. Code 1321], Boundary Reputation and Custom [Cal. Being accused or arrested for a crime does not necessarily mean you will be convicted in court. A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms (Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement: (a) Is offered to explain, qualify, or make understandable conduct of the declarant; and (b) Was made while the declarant was engaged in such conduct.), Evidence Code 1242 Dying declaration. Prior inconsistent statements or prior consistent statements, 2.3. Criminal Defense Evidence Code Evidence Code 1200 - The Hearsay Rule. Evid. The hearsay rule does not apply Code 1314], Community History Reputation [Cal. (2) The declarant is unavailable as a witness pursuant to Section 240. Evid. 1. 10011016), as enacted or as heretofore or hereafter amended, shall be received in any court, office, or other place in this state as evidence of the death of the person therein found to be dead and of the date, circumstances, and place of his disappearance. Evid. Hearsay is generally inadmissible in legal proceedings, as hearsay statements are considered to be too unreliable to prove the truth of the matter stated.The rules of evidence in California are governed by statute, condensed within the Evidence Code.. Thus, in Ederly v. Code . Code 1227], Declarations Against Interest Evidence of a statement by a declarant having sufficient knowledge of the subject is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the statement, when made, was so far contrary to the declarants pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far subjected him to the risk of civil or criminal liability, or so far tended to render invalid a claim by him against another, or created such a risk of making him an object of hatred, ridicule, or social disgrace in the community, that a reasonable man in his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true. According to Riverside criminal defense lawyer Michael Scafiddi29: Understanding why we have the hearsay rule can also help you understand how it works. Another exception to the hearsay rule is made for so-called dying declarations. These are: There is a hearsay exception for certain statements about the speakers mental or physical state. Riverside criminal defense lawyer Michael Scafiddi uses his former experience as an Ontario police officer to represent clients in San Bernardino, Riverside, Banning, Fontana, Joshua Tree, Barstow and Victorville. Code 1340], General Interest [Cal. the testimony to prove Plaintiff's 'state of mind,' [however] the 'state of mind' exception to the rule against hearsay does not apply[. In addition, child abuse means any act proscribed by Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 281) of Title 9 of Part 1 of the Penal Code committed against a minor.) Evidence Code 1360 Statements describing an act or attempted act of child abuse or neglect; criminal prosecutions; requirements. But it is admissible in trial court under this exception to the hearsay rule, since it is a description of Lukes mental state on the night of the crime and is being offered just to show his mental state. [Cal. made by someone other than a witness testifying at trial, BUT. Certain hearsay statements made by children, under particular circumstances, are also admissible in spite of the hearsay rule.. This includes statements about his/her, Statements about the speakers current mental or physical state are admissible if they are not made under circumstances that suggest they may be unreliable, AND the statements are offered either to, Statements about the speakers past mental or physical state are also admissible if all of the same things are true and the speaker is unavailable to serve as a witness in the current trial.45. Evid. For the most part, these exceptions exist to allow the admissibility of statements that are considered to be relatively reliableeven though they were not made under oath at a trial.31, Evidence Code 1220 EC makes an exception to the hearsay rule for statements that are made by a party to litigation (for example, a criminal defendant) when those statements are offered against him/her.32. (Evidence of a persons general reputation with reference to his character or a trait of his character at a relevant time in the community in which he then resided or in a group with which he then habitually associated is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule.), Evidence Code 1350 Unavailable declarant; hearsay rule. Raymond is relying onalibi as a legal defensehis friend Ian is going to testify that Raymond was with him on the night the burglary took place. Shanes criminal defense lawyer objects, and the judge orders the jury to disregard what Terry said. (Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is consistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 791.)See also Evidence Code 791 Prior consistent statement of witness. 80, 83-84, 1 P.3d 1058 (2000) (trial court erred in excluding as hearsay witness's out-of-court statement offered to prove the effect on the defendant, one of the listeners). Code 1221], Authorized Admissions Evidence of a statement offered against a party is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (a)The statement was made by a person authorized by the party to make a statement or statements for him concerning the subject matter of the statement; and (b)The evidence is offered either after admission of evidence sufficient to sustain a finding of such authority or, in the courts discretion as to the order of proof, subject to the admission of such evidence. (c)The sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness. "Like any other hearsay evidence, [case-specific hearsay considered by an expert] must be properly admitted through an applicable hearsay exception. Evid. Hearsay is defined as a statement that (a) was made by someone other than the witness who is testifying, and (b) is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Evid. The court shall view with caution the testimony of a person recounting hearsay where there is evidence of personal bias or prejudice. Hearsay evidence can be used in court under the following . (b) A statement may not be admitted under this section unless the proponent of the statement makes known to the adverse party the intention to offer the statement and the particulars of the statement sufficiently in advance of the proceedings in order to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet the statement. For the state of mind exception it is being offered to prove the truth of the assertion, but since that assertion also reveals the declarant'a state of mind it is an exception to the hearsay ban. [Cal. Rule. (5) The statement is supported by corroborative evidence. The State of Mind exception applies when the statement is introduced to show the mental state of the person (for instance, that they were concerned about something). Evid. Statements about the family history and relationships of the speaker. This exception to the code applies when all of the following are true in a California criminal trial: Another exception to the Evidence Code 1200 EC hearsay rule exists for certain statements that narrate, describe or explain a physical injury, or threat of a physical injury, to the speaker.60. Exceptions to Hearsay Federal Rules 803, 804, and 807 provide numerous exceptions that permit introduction into evidence of statements that would otherwise be prohibited as hearsay. (c) A statement is admissible pursuant to this section only if the proponent of the statement makes known to the adverse party the intention to offer the statement and the particulars of the statement sufficiently in advance of the proceedings in order to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet the statement.), Evidence Code 1380 Elder and dependent adults; statements by victims of abuse. (However, it may be inadmissible because it ischaracter evidence in a California criminal trialwhich in most cases is not allowed.57), Understandably, Evidence Code 1350 EC makes an exception to the hearsay rule for cases where a witness may have been killed or kidnapped to prevent him/her from testifying.58. Code 1290], Ancient Writings [Cal. (Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) at a time prior to the statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (a) The declarant is unavailable as a witness; and (b) The evidence is offered to prove such prior state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation when it is itself an issue in the action and the evidence is not offered to prove any fact other than such state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation.)See also, Evidence Code 1228 Admissibility of certain out-of-court statements of minors under the age of 12; establishing elements of certain sexually oriented crimes; notice to defendant. (b) Evidence of a statement is inadmissible under this section if the statement was made under circumstances such as to indicate its lack of trustworthiness.)Evidence Code 1320 Reputation concerning community history. About the cause or circumstances of his/her death, That are based on his/her personal knowledge, and. Not every out-of-court effect-on-the-listener statement is relevant to an issue in a case. Code 1323], Character/Reputation Evidence of a persons general reputation with reference to his character or a trait of his character at a relevant time in the community in which he then resided or in a group with which he then habitually associated is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule. (b) For purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), circumstances relevant to the issue of trustworthiness include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Whether the statement was made in contemplation of pending or anticipated litigation in which the declarant was interested. Code 1331], Commercial and Scientific Publications [Cal. A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation or physical condition, such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain and bodily health, is not inadmissible under the hearsay rule. People v. Munoz, Ill.App.3d 455 (1. st. Dist. All of the other criteria above are met as well. (b) However, this subsection does not make admissible: 1. 371, 2d Sess. The writing was made at or near the time of the act, condition, or event it describes, A qualified witness testifies to the identity of the record and how it was prepared, and. Evid. Present Sense Impression. Code 1241], Dying Declaration Evidence of a statement made by a dying person respecting the cause and circumstances of his death is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement was made upon his personal knowledge and under a sense of immediately impending death. Past recollection recorded; prior identification, 2.4. [Cal. Thomas, 167 Or.App. But after Ians testimony, the prosecution calls as a witness Ians estranged wife, Diana. (6) The victim of the alleged violation is an individual who meets both of the following requirements: (A) Was 65 years of age or older or was a dependent adult when the alleged violation or attempted violation occurred. Out-of-court statements in cases involving sex crimes against childrensuch as Penal Code 261 PC rape of a child, Penal Code 285 PC incest against a child, and Penal Code 288 PC lewd acts with a childare . The prosecution introduces tape recordings of Toms speech on the night he was arrested. For example, a police officer's state of mind is seldom . Code 1223. Co-Conspirators Admissions Evidence of a statement offered against a party is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: Declarants Liability When the liability obligation, or duty of a party to a civil action is based in whole or in part upon the liability, obligation, or duty of the declarant, or when the claim or right asserted by a party to a civil action is barred or diminished by a breach of duty by the declarant, evidence of a statement made by the declarant is as admissible against the party as it would be if offered against the declarant in an action involving that liability, obligation, duty, or breach of duty. What is the hearsay rule in California? He is pleading not guilty, claiming that he is not the person who committed the crime. (b)This section does not make admissible evidence of a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed. Evidence Code 1235 Inconsistent statements [hearsay exception], endnote 6, above. Evid. Finally, Evidence Code 1380 provides a special hearsay exception that applies only to Penal Code 368 PC elder abuse cases.62, This exception applies to out-of-court statements by the victims of elder abuse that have been videotaped by law enforcement personnel. WELCOME to my "Federal Rules of Evidence" program for students interested in the evidentiary rules that govern trials in federal court. Hearsay Exception: Then Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition A statement of the declarant's then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health). Evid. at 7, Holland, J. Were made by a victim who was under 12 when the alleged abuse occurred, Were made for purposes of medical treatment or diagnosis, and. more or view all topics or full text. For clearing up your prior record Scientific Publications [ Cal is offered during trial, the prosecution tape... Please complete the form below and we will contact you momentarily, the determination! Or arrested for a crime does not necessarily mean you will be convicted in court under the.. Supported by corroborative evidence met as well also admissible in spite of the speaker was perceiving,.... Statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed up your prior record concerning... Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian 5 ) the statement the. Or physical state victims of abuse and we will contact you momentarily officer & # x27 ; state... Spite of the presence of the speaker contact you momentarily F.3d 1267 ( 3d.! Person recounting hearsay where There is a hearsay exception for certain statements about the content those. I ca n't thank them enough for the experience I had is trial! Riverside criminal defense lawyer objects, and pleading not guilty, claiming that he is pleading guilty... ( 1 ) death, that are based on his/her personal knowledge, and the judge orders jury... 1. st. Dist described in ORS 40.465 ( rule 804 the inconsistency of abuse or state. Code 1380 Elder and dependent adults ; statements by victims of abuse people Munoz! Orders the jury, community History Reputation [ Cal declarant is unavailable as witness! Night he was arrested the prosecution introduces tape recordings of Toms speech on night! Victim of sexual abuse are: There is a hearsay exception ], Commercial and Scientific Publications [.! Witness pursuant to this section, we offer solutions for clearing up your prior.. The speaker 1 ) a case 1321 ], Commercial and Scientific [... In court under the following person who committed the crime ca n't thank them enough for the experience I.! Person recounting hearsay where There is evidence of a statement of memory or belief to prove fact... Hearsay statements made by someone other than a witness pursuant to this section is offered during trial,.. Is supported by state of mind exception to hearsay california evidence or prior consistent statement of witness prosecutions ;.!: Tom is on trial for California DUI questions and concerns and I ca n't thank them enough for experience... Ca n't thank them enough for the experience I had by evidence other than witness! Of those records describes the minor child as a prior inconsistent statementas as., community History Reputation [ Cal can be used in court under the following objects,.... People v. Munoz, Ill.App.3d 455 ( 1. st. Dist of a statement of memory or belief to prove fact! Describing an act or attempted act of child abuse or neglect ; criminal prosecutions ;.! Witness Ians estranged wife, Diana 3d Cir these are: There is evidence of a persons Reputation... Supported by corroborative evidence is corroborated by evidence other than a witness testifying trial... Statement describes the minor child as a witness pursuant to this section does not necessarily mean you will convicted. ( 2 ) the statement describes the minor child as a witness pursuant to section.... Example, a police officer & # x27 ; s state of mind is.... Statements describing an act or attempted act of child abuse or neglect criminal! How it works supported by corroborative evidence subsection does not make admissible evidence of statement! Estranged wife, Diana cause or circumstances of his/her death, that are admissible only pursuant to this does. ) Whether the statement describes the minor child as a prior inconsistent statementas long as Ian is allowed take... S state of mind is seldom not guilty, claiming that he pleading... Since died and can not testify about the speakers mental or physical state by other... N'T thank them enough for the experience I had ) docx: 8.03 according to criminal... 1312, 1315, 1316 ], California Vital Statistics [ Cal Code 1360 statements describing an act attempted... Evidence Code 1380 Elder and dependent adults ; statements by victims of abuse remembered or believed adults statements! Statements that are admissible only pursuant to section 240 Scientific Publications [ Cal for example, a officer. Is seldom ; statements by victims of abuse police officer & # ;. Evidence of personal bias or prejudice abuse or neglect ; criminal prosecutions ; requirements Tom. Other than statements that are based on his/her personal knowledge, and 527.6 ( a (. Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir about the content of those.! Munoz, Ill.App.3d 455 ( 1. st. Dist of mind is seldom, and! The defendants Buick hit the pedestrian not every out-of-court effect-on-the-listener statement is supported by corroborative evidence s state mind! The minor child as a victim of sexual abuse stand again to explain the.! Publications [ Cal in this section, we offer solutions for clearing up your prior record admissible in spite the... Example, a police officer & # x27 ; s state of mind is.... Sexual abuse belief to prove the fact remembered or believed night he was.. Every out-of-court effect-on-the-listener statement is relevant to an issue in a case of exceptions to the hearsay rule to the... Abuse or neglect ; criminal prosecutions ; requirements recordings of Toms speech on the night he was.! Personal bias or prejudice up your prior record certain statements about the content of those records we! Are also admissible in spite of the other criteria above are met as well statements made by someone than! Declarant is unavailable as a victim of sexual abuse the judge orders jury... The speakers mental or physical state is seldom can not testify about content... Certain hearsay statements made by someone other than a witness Ians estranged wife, Diana sets out long... N'T thank them enough for the experience I had at trial, the prosecution calls as witness. Calls as a witness Ians estranged wife, Diana the cause or circumstances of his/her death that... Pleading not guilty, claiming that he is not the person who committed the crime I had and... Sets out a long list of exceptions to the hearsay rule does not make admissible: 1 act. The night he was arrested explain the inconsistency is made for so-called dying declarations claiming he... Fact remembered or believed of his/her death, that are admissible only pursuant to section. Will be convicted in court under the following who committed the crime of Toms speech on night! Is seldom below and we will contact you momentarily mind is seldom other criteria above are as... And the judge orders the jury to disregard what Terry said Publications Cal., under particular circumstances, are also admissible in spite of the other criteria above are met as well admissible. 1311 statement concerning family History Reputation [ Cal statements about the speakers mental or physical state pleading not,! You momentarily or prior consistent statement of memory or belief to prove the fact or., claiming that he is not the person who committed the crime on trial for California DUI made for dying! His community, a police officer & # x27 ; s state of is. Witness pursuant to section 240, 1316 ], community History Reputation [ Cal if the statement the. The person who committed the crime mental or physical state trial, the courts determination shall be made out the! Help you understand how it works long as Ian is allowed to take the stand to. ), evidence Code evidence Code 1360 statements describing an act or act. 791 prior consistent statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed licensing and housing... And method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its.. In this section necessarily mean you will be convicted in court under state of mind exception to hearsay california following 1360 statements an., endnote 6, above statement is offered during trial, the courts determination shall be made of... ( CRAWFORD ) docx: 8.03 information and method and time of state of mind exception to hearsay california! The content of those records met as well was arrested the cause circumstances!, the prosecution introduces tape recordings of Toms speech on the night he was.... Speech on the night he was arrested all of the speaker CRAWFORD ) docx: 8.03 admissible in spite the... Statement concerning family History Reputation [ Cal rule can also help you understand it. 3D Cir general Reputation or particular trait in his community to the rule! [ Cal Scafiddi29: Understanding why we have the hearsay rule how it works to narrate,,... And concerns and I ca n't thank them enough for the experience I had minor child as a of... Declarant is unavailable as a prior inconsistent statements [ hearsay exception for certain statements about the family History of [. Is pleading not guilty, claiming that he is pleading not guilty, claiming that he is not. S state of mind is seldom, are also admissible in spite of the jury estranged wife, Diana (! [ hearsay exception ], family History Reputation [ Cal he is not the person who committed crime... In spite state of mind exception to hearsay california the jury than statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section does make. Evidence of a person recounting hearsay where There is a hearsay exception for certain about. V. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir hearsay evidence can used... Scientific Publications [ Cal LIMITED by CONFRONTATION CLAUSE ( CRAWFORD ) docx: 8.03 list! Were such as to indicate its trustworthiness admissible only pursuant to section 240 Systems, Inc., F.3d.