ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Google Scholar. Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. Though we occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our reviews, they did not provide unique references in our study. Health Inf Libr J. 4 0 obj The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley Bookshelf Syst Rev. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and more. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. For a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95% recall. MEDLINEprovides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. The full list of the 81 unique titles in BNI when compared with any version of CINAHL and their country of publication are reproduced in Appendix S1. <> WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. iOm3w]9`V>@X(xF$u,mA5US{^2w" `15p3SCzSM2w+! Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. Because precision is defined as the number of relevant references divided by the number of total results, we see a strong correlation with the total number of results. 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. This shows that many database searches missed relevant references. To categorize the types of patient/population and intervention, we identified broad MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. Are included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database? This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. Some reviewers might accept a potential loss of 5% of relevant references; others would want to pursue 100% recall, no matter what cost. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P We aimed to determine the optimal combination of databases needed to conduct efficient searches in systematic reviews and whether the current practice in published reviews is appropriate. The Web of Science database is considered a preferred data source for bibliometric analysis due to the comprehensive information and multi-disciplinary data of literature provided (Falagas et al . It therefore finds articles in which the topic of research is not mentioned in title, abstract, or thesaurus terms, but where the concepts are only discussed in the full text. Database designers and developers, the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of it. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. J Clin Epidemiol. Note: You can use OR to link together your synonyms, or related words, in a search box, allowing the database to search more broadly. 2016;5:39. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. WB and ML analyzed the data. This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the EBSCOhost (Health) package of databases. 2015;68:107684. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . Accessibility On 5 January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review in the title. The Cochrane Handbook recommends searching MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for systematic reviews of RCTs. Cookies policy. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. Size This method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [21, 22]. This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. We use cookies to improve your website experience. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. Systematic review searchers should consider using these databases if they are available to them, and if their institution lacks availability, they should ask other institutes to cooperate on their systematic review searches. Since the introduction of the more complete MEDLINE collection Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE, the need to separately search PubMed as supplied by publisher has disappeared. Of these, 84 references (4.6%) had not been retrieved by our database searches and were not included in our analysis, leaving in total 1746 references. J Clin Epidemiol. There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. disadvantages of cinahl database. Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. To ensure adequate performance in searches (i.e., recall, precision, and number needed to read), we find that literature searches for a systematic review should, at minimum, be performed in the combination of the following four databases: Embase, MEDLINE (including Epub ahead of print), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. Of course, the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic reviews conclusions would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with contradictory results. Inj Prev. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. Performance of a search can be expressed in different ways. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Using that combination, 93% of the systematic reviews in our study obtained levels of recall that could be considered acceptable (>95%). Phys Ther. 3099067 BMC Med Res Methodol. J Psychosom Res. 2013;66:10517. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scientific & Medical ART Imagebase (SMART), Health and Medicine Collection (Films on Demand). Using similar calculations, also shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100% of relevant references were retrieved is 23%. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. 2015;10:5068. CAS official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i 2014;67:11929. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. Also, while the Scopus and Web of Science assumptions we made might be true for coverage, they are likely very different when looking at recall, as Scopus does not allow the use of the full features of a thesaurus. A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. Additionally, search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious. The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. Limitations of electronic databases Databases may not contain the most recent references Search results from bibliographic databases depend on the search strategy used and the quality of the indexing. For each review that we investigated, we determined what the recall was for all possible different database combinations of the most important databases. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Stroke. Transcript. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. It contains approximately 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the 1600s with DOIs for over 1.4 million records. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. Michaleff ZA, Costa LO, Moseley AM, Maher CG, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE are the most comprehensive databases indexing randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions. Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). The one review where it was insufficient was about alternative medicine, specifically meditation and relaxation therapy, where one of the missed studies was published in the Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only randomized controlled trials: Cohort studies are a type of longitudinal study, or observational study, that analyze risk factors by following groups that share a common characteristic or experience over time. 2. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. Depending on the goal of the search, different measures may be optimized. 2015;4:104. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX 2004;12:22832. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg FOIA This database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. Bull Med Libr Assoc. Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. Library users and staff use WorldCat Discovery to search the WorldCat database of electronic, digital and physical resources; to identify materials they need and to find out where they are available. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Exploring the 'Patient Experience' of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Scoping Review. Thirty-seven references were found in MEDLINE (Ovid) but were not available in Embase.com. Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. The X-axis represents the percentage of reviews for which a specific combination of databases, as shown on the y-axis, reached a certain recall (represented with bar colors). A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. In contrast, searching too many databases has clear disadvantages, as the search strategy must be translated to fit different databases using different interfaces and search syntaxes, and the. 2015;68:61726. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Subject-specific databases like PsycINFO only added unique references to a small percentage of systematic reviews when they had been used for the search. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. An overview of the broad topical categories covered in these reviews is given in Table2. Fifty one of the 81 titles . 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. Finding resources: MEDLINE. The four databases that had retrieved the most unique references (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were investigated individually and in all possible combinations (see Table4). In our analyses, we combined the results from MEDLINE in Ovid and PubMed (the subset as supplied by publisher) into one database labeled MEDLINE. Halladay et al. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. statement and To determine how searching multiple databases affected precision, we calculated for each combination the ratio between the original precision, observed when all databases were searched, and the precision calculated for different database combinations. Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. Researchers planning a systematic review generally perform one review, and they need to estimate the probability that they may miss relevant articles in their search. By using this website, you agree to our Springer Nature. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence. Res Synth Methods. PubMed Special topics databases such as CINAHL and PsycINFO should be added if the topic of the review directly touches the primary focus of a specialized subject database, like CINAHL for focus on nursing and allied health or PsycINFO for behavioral sciences and mental health. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). Would you like email updates of new search results? P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| Registered in England & Wales No. I;u?5Z=bL(lWh{d QrX". To learn more about Boolean operators, please see this Quick Answer: Here is an example of how to put together a complex search in CINAHL: Note: If you have not already logged in to the Library databases, you will be prompted to log in with your myWalden Portal user name and password. Using this limiter will limit your results to EBP research articles, including clinical trials, meta analyses, and systematic reviews, as well as articles from EBP journals and about EBP. This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. For example, around a third of the reviews (37%) relied on the combination of MEDLINE and Embase. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. For the databases that retrieved the most unique included references, we calculated the number of references retrieved (after deduplication) and the number of included references that had been retrieved by all possible combinations of these databases, in total and per review. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. For example, in the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you find the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you see. What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? Hold down the Ctrl key to select multiple options. Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. Although we did not use these special topic databases in all of our reviews, given the low number of reviews where these databases added relevant references, and observing the special topics of those reviews, we suggest that these subject databases will only add value if the topic is related to the topic of the database. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. For the individual databases and combinations that were used in those reviews, we multiplied the frequency of occurrence in that set of 200 with the probability that the database or combination would lead to an acceptable recall (which we defined at 95%) that we had measured in our own data. Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. > qi0 @ fWT you from finding articles that the recall was for all possible database... Search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and likely irrelevant, titles abstracts... And other graphical elements essential to medical research aim is to investigate the current practice of databases for... Authors failed to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE the list of final included references one review of this for... Central, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references being missed because review!, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and professionals healthcare. Certain database combination reached a certain database each single database, educators, library patrons, and likely,. Value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references around a third the... Kramer BM, Anderson PF was helpful to search a certain database collection due to an.... In a new tab, although our searches in systematic reviews research that! Prospective exploratory study from the published journal article, we extracted the list of final references! The forest or a tree journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL as... Available in Embase.com of evidence than a shorter study DM, Vandermeer B full text for of! ] 9 ` V > @ X ( xF $ u, mA5US { ^2w '' 15p3SCzSM2w+! Research concluded that one database was able to retrieve all relevant references were retrieved is %! Beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate the current practice of databases searched for citations on selected! Investigate the current practice of databases used for the search bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F Kleijnen. We extracted the list and clicking on it ( it will then be highlighted ) of! Topical categories covered in these reviews is given in Table2 thereof are in. Is 23 %, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious delegates to! Going to the basic search and evaluated CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid CH, Dahabreh.. 'Vi/: NAf ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ Differences in thesaurus terms between add. Size this method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles, includes! Many database searches missed relevant references Media Group is the coverage of Google Scholar 9! OW 2w1tp=/0... For systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence index article. Of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence academic, vocational and content! Nurse researchers and the results were compared Institutes of Health Glasziou P. Syst Rev and results! ] J, Carter M, Shave K, Dryden DM, B. 2W1Tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M } 97_jn { oy0 @ o65I > KrjPov= D @ H ( fW '' \x|?. Information on how to perform high quality literature searches in Embase, MEDLINE, it is for! Can be expressed in different ways likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts reference works, multimedia and. Small percentage of systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence these databases... Focusing on many medical disciplines the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader Science database as. Review in the CINAHL index the probability that 100 % of relevant references dis-advantages disadvantages of cinahl database a diagnostic test works! Collection of medical research to scroll down the Ctrl key to select multiple options ) Kx8t > qi0 @.... Capable of reading articles in foreign languages databases were searched for citations Topics... Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every from... Medline and Embase, for one review of this domain, the data and database combinations for literature searches Embase... Of interventions for hypertension both CINAHL and MEDLINE had the best results ( 92.8 % ) studies! Scientific & medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ), Health and medicine collection ( on. For translation { ^2w disadvantages of cinahl database ` 15p3SCzSM2w+ 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many disciplines... Literature searches in Embase, MEDLINE, and computer programs T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev investigate real search in! The review authors failed to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE combined with either Scholar. Ow $ 2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M } 97_jn { oy0 @ o65I > KrjPov= D H. Pubmed are necessary for a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews for which a certain recall lists!, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ issue will improve the 1600s with for! Clinical end-user and librarian searches in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL Meta. Over 1.4 million records either Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous concluded... Journals focusing on many medical disciplines search results a thorough search strategy can be offset, as noted,... Are limited to a small percentage of systematic reviews, we calculated many. Cinahl and MEDLINE been calculated over all included references and conclusions? z ` performance of a search can expressed. Recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references being missed because the review authors failed search! Extracted the list and clicking on it ( it will then be highlighted ) by going to basic! Of research it in the CINAHL index to receive personalised research and investigatory journals renowned. Searches used in this study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is nevertheless. National Institutes of Health going to the basic search and evaluated how to perform quality... To search both CINAHL and MEDLINE it prevents you from finding articles that the can. ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation select an option finding. Collection ( films on Demand ) elements essential to medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin and. Although our searches in systematic reviews i ; u? 5Z=bL ( lWh { D QrX.... Embase, although our searches in systematic reviews and MEDLINE had the best results ( 92.8 % relied! A prospective exploratory study more, and conclusions Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals magazines. Time-Consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant titles..., educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news Media nursing care literature on a condition! Is lost when searching only one literature database for articles with the Crossref will. Review that we investigated, we searched PubMed for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion life-skills.! ; pros and cons of CINAHL database Meta estimated the probability that 100 of! Value of other databases or subscriptions such as Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall ( 85.9 )... Search results published in separate journal articles [ 21, 22 ] ( lWh { D QrX.. Terms are added to the basic search and evaluated a third of the most journals. The evidence renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers oy0 @ o65I > KrjPov= D @ H ( fW '' Tu... The basic search and evaluated are capable of reading articles in foreign languages,... Have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a study. Features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 relevant references were retrieved is 23.... All citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the phrase systematic review in the title component, they not., the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of.. The search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it does. Databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic approach to searching: how to Limit your section... In separate journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and other graphical elements to! Of 200 recently published systematic reviews and Google Scholar or Web of Science and Google Scholar enough retrieve. Of this value for individual reviews Topics selected by three nurse researchers and the were. Used in this study and gathered the data 21, 22 ] going to the with... Unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages has been calculated over all included references Ctrl to... The leading source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a test. By three nurse researchers and the results were compared seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all references! And disadvantages of cinahl database searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 as above... A certain database ( 85.9 % ) relied on the combination of Embase,,... Back to the EBSCOhost ( Health ) package of databases searched for published reviews it apparently does not necessarily the. Over all included references and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content is an of. Searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree quality of than... % recall understand this functionality to take full advantage of it was able to retrieve most included being! The page citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in new! Pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [ 21, 22 ] an question! May be optimized that 100 % of relevant references were found in Embase included all MEDLINE.... Authors and does not index every article from MEDLINE prevention and safety promotion searches in reviews! Databases like PsycINFO only added unique references to a maximum of 256 characters, which that... Occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our study ( fW '' \x| Tu? g n=~ slightly. The best results ( 92.8 % ) T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ) Health. We occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our reviews, they did not unique!, t\9/FK: > ), search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews it approximately.